morihe.icu

The portal design shall take the following interface
Website Company Name (AGRI- POWER PORTAL)

Links navigation Link
Home

Services
Commercial
Accounts
About us
Login
Logout
Farm Chemicals
Farm tools
Farm projects
Horticulture
Livestock
Livestock Faming

Bee keeping
Seeds
Transport
Comments
Agricultural Dash Board Portal Major Display Area
Figure1 : The portal Design for Agricultural Based Enterprise
The agriculture based portal shall provide web-based services to the esteemed customers and the potential customer. The agribusiness portal shall contain three structural designs to incorporate the services to the clients. The portal is a dynamic website that provides all agricultural services across the world. The portal provides services on farm-based services like purchasing chemicals, use of chemicals and consultation services. The portal has horticulture farming, livestock farming, and beekeeping services. The display area provides streaming advertisements on projects and the news about agriculture.

Simple Information Exchanges
The secure health information exchange supports the following services to the clients

Document querying and retrieving
Direct messaging via PUSH technology
The system composes discrete data and information from multiple CCDs that contain detailed data from multiple sources. The system provides data sharing techniques to subscribers through the data mining and data warehousing approach (Bocciarelli, & D’Ambrogio, 2014).

Part B: Integrated Architectures
Enterprise integration for Business Services module supports enterprise process and goals through providing multiplatform programming support platform. The system integrates the business functions using VMware technology that acts as the middleware to support different platforms in other programming languages like XML, COBOL, Java, Microsoft Dot Net and others (Juric, et al…, 2010).

Legacy applications include the business application service and infrastructure services. The modules provide the integration of the database services through the modification of data and information. The sessions support data and information conversion to different formats. The strategies get applied during database development process, data mining activities and during data migration from one database design infrastructure to another.

B2B Integration and management services provide secure transfer and sharing of information between the public and private business enterprises across the world (Dorn, et al…, 2009). The system allows collaboration of business enterprises through subscribing to the Intranet cloud services. The platform supports the integration and interagency communications across the globe. The system supports the G2G systems that allow effective government interventions (Dorn, et al…, 2009). The system facilitates communication between the government agencies. The Interaction services systems support the intra-agency relations through the elimination of barriers for infrastructure principles and standard specified by the EAI policies. Through the interaction services module, inter-agency communications get approved enabling collaboration between people processes and information. The NIEM (National Information Exchange), development services platform, integrates the communication development environments through equalizing sanctions and standards from different agencies.

The system allows designing and creation of solutions depicted within different business entities. The collaboration allows acceptability of the various development standards for business entities to enter into the global market. The NIEM platform links the B2B systems to facilitate mutual interrelationships between different business operations (Dorn, et al…, 2009).

ESB Exploration: The enterprise service bus allows effective communication link between different enterprise activities and function to facilitate effective data and information transfer. All network and communication protocols get implemented through accommodating all sources of networks topologies and standards within the bus (Chandrasekaran, 2010). The bus offer powerful encapsulation, encryption and information hiding techniques to facilitate secure source to destination delivery of data and information (Chandrasekaran, 2010). The Mule architecture serves more effectively and efficiently compared to email based protocols. The message is secure via mule architecture and supports UDDI messaging protocols. The ESB architecture supports the orchestration, transformation, transportation mediation and non-functional consistency that form the core integration principles (Chandrasekaran, 2010).

Smart enterprises the smart enterprise capability is maintained via the incorporation of the extranet and intranet services that facilitate the extraction of data and information from different databases. The system allows digging of data from various databases through data mining techniques. The system supports the smart enterprise feature like intelligent decision support system. The enterprise business system implements the intelligence support capabilities through the use of access service model and the service registry database. The data and the information are supplied through cloud computing services that link the enterprise system to the World Wide Web interfaces. The Virtual technology that implements the industrial formats like the X12, the EDIFACTS, the SWIFT, the ACORD, the HIPAA and the HLA have been applied to support IBM web sphere transformation extension (Chandrasekaran, 2010). The platforms act as the universal transformation engine.

Introduction
Before the 1960s, roles of correctional officers were custody-oriented. Personnel selection standards were low and in, many cases they never existed. Candidates for correctional officer jobs were only required to have minimal education level and in some prisons, education wasn’t considered in hiring. The main incentive for correctional officer job remained security provided by the civil service employment in an employment that many found appealing as well as lucrative as compared to farming or manufacturing jobs. Individuals were also forced work as prison officers by unfortunate circumstance like job scarcity unavailability of job scarcity, layoffs, injuries, or as a result of their failure in their primary occupation choice. As a consequence, the typical correctional officer was a rural, male with little or no education. They were also politically conservative characterized by brutality and they in many case proved slow in accepting change. Many came to correctional jobs at relatively mature ages after success in the civilian life while other had retired from military. Training in all cases was done the job and always involved nothing on top of a recruit being handed cell block keys and t instructed to quickly learn the demands of the job (Josi & Sechrest, 1998). The custody- focused correctional officer role definition remained unambiguous. Their roles were to keep security as well as control by enforcing institutional regulations. The accomplish ability to this goal based on unchallenged authority to accuse and punish prisoners from violating violations rules without regarding the due process as well as inmate rights. The control approaches to prisoners relied on physical coercion as well as discipline.

Correctional Officers were therefore referred to as always guards since guarding prisoners was their sole expected role. As a consequence, there exist a widespread public view that correctional officer have low intelligence, alienated, cynical, brutal, burned out, alienated stressed, and their role is to repress minority people. However, commencing 1960s a wide range of prisoner rehabilitation programs became introduced in prison institutions that historically were viewed custody and control as only organizational goal. The new rehabilitation emphasis also introduced an expectation that correctional officers were to go beyond their vividly defined security tasks and assume the much more ambiguous responsibility of human service-oriented workers who would help highly trained treatment professionals in prisoners’ rehabilitation. Rehabilitation introduction in [prisons developed an ambiguous social organization through the introduction of sets of contradictory objectives. The custody goal requires the maintenance of enough social distance between correctional officers and prisoners and avoiding informal relationships, affective ties as well as discretionary enforcement of rules. However, treatment goal demand relaxed discipline, informal relationships minimizing social distance, affective ties as well as the exercising of discretionary rule enforcement depending on particular inmate characteristics as well as circumstances. Punitive regulatory policies became subordinated to an expectation that correctional were to be human-oriented and flexible. Many correctional facilities currently impress the double roles of custody and treatment (McMinn, 2010). As a result, correctional officers are now called change agents when are supposed to utilize their discretion to help in rehabilitation of inmates while at the same time keeping security through enforcement of rules. Simultaneous handling of custody and treatment generates conflict characterized by some uncertainty since correctional officers can be disciplined if they violate the institutional policies that are aimed at rehabilitating inmates.

Introduction of Prisoner Rehabilitation in the US
Introducing rehabilitation coincided by many USA supreme court ruling which provided inmates with more civil rights while at the same time reducing the ability of correctional officer against reliance on punitive controls. The outcome was due process- focused disciplinary hearings, abolishment of using isolation as disciplinary approach and the creation of formal prisoner’s grievance mechanisms. The decision by the court significantly reduced the powers of correctional officers while at the same time providing inmates with strong countervailing rights. These changes in powers created for officers in correctional institutions view of loss of control and a perception that managers and treatment professionals emerged more respect for prisoners than them. As a result, the perception continue to make correctional officers view themselves as unfairly restated thus generating great ingrained frustration and lack of appreciation by superiors (Parker, 2007). Among the significant outcomes of the perception was that the managers as well as the professional were never at par with the correctional officers. On the eve of the 1970s, the US federal law gave the correctional officers the power to unionize. As a result, the joined strong national unions including the American Federation of states, county as well as municipals workers whose management has perfectly challenged many management policies perceived as not being in the best interest of their rank and file. Such unions are critical since they have power to influence management resource allocation making salaries as well as benefits rising drastically. With such efforts, correctional officers continue to serve under the new guidelines while working with inmates. Therefore, the main change in the role of these officers is simply the shift from authority to service in changing inmates from criminality to harmless persons in the society. The reason behind this move was that harsh punitive measures would do more harm to an offender as compared to the perceived benefits.

Inmate Rehabilitation
Inmate rehabilitation is the process of re-integrating a convicted person into the society with the primary objective to counter reoffending or criminal recidivism. Rehabilitation has been a central goal of correctional system. Its goal rests on an assumption that offenders can be treated and returns to law abiding lifestyle. It includes a great array of initiatives such as, substance abuse, mental health as well as educational services. Additionally, specialty initiatives are developed for sex offenders, women and parolees. Despite their original barbaric roles in the medieval dungeon and torture chamber, from the 18th century, correctional officers have combined punishment element with rehabilitation element to assist prisoners (Morris, & Rothman, 1995). As Michel Foucault the French philosopher puts it, ‘punishment shifted from disciplining the body to disciplining the soul”. Rehabilitation of inmates has remained a critical feature of modern criminal justice system directed at reforming both the character of prisoners and preventing recidivism. Many types of research reveal that exposing prisoners to harsh conditions hardens them into harder criminals. Punitive measures make them develop a negative attitude towards the public and more so the victim and upon release, they easily reoffended as a response to the pain realized in prison. Research also reveals that rehabilitation usually makes offenders understand and appreciate their wrongdoing and in the end, they decide to become law abiding. It is evident that chances of recidivism are low among ex-convicts who went through rehabilitative programs as compared to those who go through punitive controls.

Roles of Correctional Officers in Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation as a changing role of a correctional officer presents various roles to them. Some are traditional with punitive dimension while others are humane and rehabilitative in nature. The roles include the inmate security, offender counseling, religious involvement, vocational training, needs assessment, linkage to specialized services and security of detention facilities. These roles are discussed as follows;

Inmate Security and Rehabilitation
Within penal institutions, correctional officers serve as voices of authority, while at the same time ensuring safety and welfare inmates. As courageous law enforcement service providers, they disrupt violence and confrontations among inmates to ensure order and help in rehabilitating prisoners. Over 434, 870 correctional officers in U.S. as of 2011, correctional officers represent one of the critical components of US criminal justice system. Correctional officers prevent exploitation among prisoners while at the same time protecting them from the angry public. Correctional officers instill peace in the penal institutions by suppressing confrontations among prisoners. They also prevent illicit materials which threaten rehabilitation from entering the penal institutions. This practice is very critical in producing an environment that enables healing from criminality to law abiding life. Research reveals that penal institutions characterized by calmness produce an environment that rehabilitates inmate. Similarly, research shows that penal institutions with chaos and fights, always promotes recidivism among inmates. Therefore, correctional officer plays a critical role in protecting the rights and freedoms of inmates which are key in the rehabilitation process.

Offender Counseling and Rehabilitation
In the rehabilitation process, correctional officers play a critical role of acting as a counselor. As counselors, they take prisoner as clients who need their assistance. Counseling helps many inmates to develop abilities of problem solving and decision making which are critical in reforming the prisons. Much research reveals that counseling dome by correctional officers greatly reduced recidivism among inmates. Counseling also makes inmates find meaning in life and the end; they always come out as law abiding citizens (Robinson & Crow, 2009). Counseling offered by correctional officers’ trains’ inmates to address problems of anxiety which is a key factor that motivates crime. Chemical dependency counseling offered by correctional officers enables prisoners with challenges of substance abuse to get therapeutic help. Counseling also provides relief which is critical I offender rehabilitation. Encouragements from correctional officers make the offender take the sentence positively and come out as a reformed person.

Religious Involvement and Rehabilitation
Correctional institutions continue to utilize research in developing a more constructive alternative for prisoners. Correctional officer involves themselves religious instruction to help prisoners. As correctional officers promote religious involvement among prisoners, many of the prisoners find inner hope as well as meaning in life. In the end, they reform into good citizens who pose no threat to the society upon release (Craig, In Dixon & Gannon, 2013). Many studies reveal that inmates who get involved in religion offend rarely. Re-incarceration among offender who was much involved in religion in many cases is low. The reason is that religion shape people’s meditation, and it easily alters the personal perception among offenders. Therefore, as correctional; officer promotes religious involvement among inmates, it gives them a good basis to rehabilitate since many religions instill morals.

Inmate Vocational Training and Rehabilitation
Correctional officers play the critical role in rehabilitating inmates by giving inmates vocational training. Bearing in mind that there are many factors that promote crime, unemployment or poverty always accounts as major factors. Therefore offering vocational training to inmates empowers the inmate upon release (Lin, 2000). Such training is critical in that they provide a ground that an inmate would rely on for his legitimate survival. Installing such skills among prisoners gives them an opportunity to survive when he is released. This program is a critical rehabilitation tool to inmates with poverty or lack of employment crimes. Correctional officers, therefore, act as trainers to prisoners making rehabilitation objectives possible. They provide trustworthy advice in the effort to improve inmates’’ lives. Many correction departments continue to recognize that inmates who perfectly participate in the programs are more likely to conform to the law whenever they complete their term in penal institutions.

Prisoner Needs Assessment and Rehabilitation
Correctional officers also help inmates who are eager to develop their futures positively by assisting them to choose institutional programs that benefit or suits them. The assessment also helps in identifying barriers to successful rehabilitation (Herberts, 1998). Through communication as well as building relationships with inmates, correctional officers manage to get insights into factors that forced the prisoner into crime. Studies show that approximately 80 percent of the prisoner is dependent on drugs; therefore, convincing them to join appropriate cognitive retraining and substance abuse counseling produces uncountable positive effects. Therefore carrying out need assessment of prisoners to identify best interventions is a critical role played by correctional officers in the process of making rehabilitation successful.

Inmate Specialized Services Linkage and Rehabilitation
The other rehabilitative responsibility of correctional officers is that of acting as links with other agencies both in and outside the community. Penal institution always works with different partners in helping offenders. These partners play critical roles in providing specialized services that are not located within boundaries of penal institutions. Specialized services may include medication, business support among others. Upon completion of vocational training and release, some ex-prisoners may need assistance to start life (Great Britain & Beith, 2011). Therefore, correctional officers become the link between the ex-prisoner and the service provider. In many cases, correctional officers are allowed to work outside of the penal facilities to link the newly released inmates with specialized treatment programs, halfway houses as well as community organizations. Correctional officers are working in prisons also assist in the rehabilitation of inmates by communicating the needs as well as risks to the parole officers, parole boards, judges or to the probation officers to help the offender.

Security of Detention Facilities and Rehabilitation
Maintaining the prison remains critical in the rehabilitation of inmates. The reason is that a single breach in the prison security may lead to contraband drugs, weapons as well as communication devices into the correctional facility, which may hamper rehabilitation. Additionally, compromises on the borders may lead to prisoners’ escape which might destruct rehabilitation (The United States, 2008). Correctional officers always identify such threats and give immediate remedies. Correctional officers ensure the facility is safe for the safety of inmates. Safety protects the offender from other influences in the free society that might tempt him into criminality. This safety is paramount in facilitating an environment for rehabilitation.

Limitations Rehabilitation as a Changing Role of Correctional Officers
Apart from prisoners profiting from rehabilitation as a changing role of correctional officers, it seems to make some inmates worse criminals. Rehabilitation presents leniency of the law against crime. Therefore, many prisoners always take advantage of this role to pretend and get released. Research consistently continues to show that time spent in custody does not successfully rehabilitate many inmates, and that majority of criminals return to crime almost immediately. It is argued that many prisoners learn new and sophisticated ways of committing crimes while they are in prison with fellow convicts (Parker, 2007). This situation also offers them the opportunity to make connections and become involved in group crimes. Rehabilitation programs can also make prisoners cheat to be granted parole.research also reveal that rehabilitation seems to make prison life interesting to some criminals since there is no serious punitive element as before. Rehabilitation also diminishes the main role of punishment. They, therefore, offend immediately they are released. Rehabilitation can also pose a threat of increased crime by encouraging potential criminals. They end up offending since they are sure that the penal life is lenient.

Conclusion
The introduction of issues of human rights remains the genesis of the shift in the roles of correctional officers. Promoted by global activism, rehabilitation remains a key role in the penal sector. Despite I t attracting varied perceptions, its idea so handling offenders serving custodial sentences with human remains something to comment. Contrary, its implementation potentially impacts crime control both negatively and positively. From the positive side, rehabilitation can address habitual offending particularly with inmates who learn from their mistakes. On the other hand, it can promote reoffending apart from having ability to motivate potential criminals. The reason for this is that, people will find prison life comfortable and therefore making them not to fear reoffending. Despite entrenching rehabilitation in social as well as criminal justice policy, the notion that penal institutions never intend to rehabilitate but to punish and protect the public maintains considerable public support in many areas. Improved conditions, as well as opportunities for rehabilitation in penal institutions, generate complaints that current life behind bars remains soft and similar to holiday camping. Resentment from the public also remains fired by the deficits in providing similar services for community rehabilitation. Drug rehabilitation, as an example, is greatly perceived to be easily accessible inside penal institutions than in the outside. Nevertheless, there are many criticisms about the rehabilitation level occurring in prisons, mostly because of lack of funding for rehabilitation programmes as well as prison overcrowding, which hinders effective implementation of rehabilitation. The achievement that penal institutions achieve is hindered further by high number of prisoners lacking primary skills while others suffer from social as well as psychological problems. Many prisoners get released without places to live, thus worsening setbacks of homelessness. Prisons also have cases of mental health problems and drug problems making the efforts of rehabilitation hard. Whatever rehabilitation happens inside the penal institutions, many ex- convicts experience some difficulty in reintegrating back to the society because of community attitude. To conclude, rehabilitation as a changing role for correctional officer remains a good initiative that can help some offenders to come out reformed. In their effort to attain its objectives, there is a need for resources and cooperation from other stakeholders as well as offenders themselves. If this role is not critically examined and implemented well, it easily generates repeat offenders.

Linux
Linux is an operating system that can get operated through Graphic User Interface (GUI). It is a complete reimplementation of the POSIX interface that got initiated by Linus Torvalds (Jaeger, 2008). POSIX refers to the portable operating system interface. It describes an application program for programmers to know the functions, data structures, and variables to utilize to implement the code they are making for the operating system. In the recent past Linux operating system has gained massive popularity, thus necessitating its promotion as a viable alternative to Windows and especially for server systems such as web servers. Fox (2014) states that a survey of the top one million web servers conducted in 2001 indicated that approximately two-thirds ran on Unix/Linux whereas slightly above the third ran on Microsoft Windows. Linux operating system continuously gains acceptance hence various measures have got adopted to address the security challenges of traditional UNIX systems.

Linux got developed initially for Intel 80386 processor-based IBM-compatible personal computers. It has since developed and gets used on other platforms based on various processor architectures that include Hewlett-Packard, Oracle, Motorola 680*0, Hewlett-Packard PA-RISC, Intel Itanium, and ARM. A variety of multiprocessor-based platforms also ports Linux. The Linux operating system comprises of two parts namely the kernel and several utilities and libraries (Haldar, 2015). The kernel is the core of the system management, although other parts execute different tasks unique to the operating system. The Linux kernel comprises of various essential parts such as process management, hardware device drivers, file system drivers, memory management, and network management (JAMES, 2011). The process management function sends the processes to the processor to create multiple processors. The memory management function allocates memory to process and frees the memory after been used by the process. The file system function is the base of Linux (Jadhav, 2014). Other types of kernel features available to user processes include system calls that undertake specific tasks that a user process would not implement efficiently on its own (Ward, 2014).

Advantages of Linux Operating System
First, Linux operating system gets used by majority servers that run on the internet. It gets attributed to the fact that the usage of Unix/Linux does not get restricted to web servers as the platform is famous for mail servers, file servers, database servers as well as domain name system servers. Second is that Macintosh operating system (Mac OS X) runs on top of a UNIX operating system that gets based on the Mach Unix Kernel. Most portable computing devices run a version of Linux such as Google Android, and also hardware devices such as firewalls, routers, and Wi-Fi access points run on Linux or UNIX (Fox, 2014).

Linux operating system has free open source meaning the source code in the software is available for programmers to add to, improve or modify the code and make the new code available. Enhancements are essential in that they assist in protecting the software so that it has fewer security loopholes. Additions, on the other hand, provide new features to the software. Alterations to the software allow users to select the version they prefer to use. The software is also freely available.

Linux operating system allows for greater control. Although Windows allow a DOS shell for the user to enter commands, there is the restriction of the DOS commands in the scope. However, in Unix or Linux the power comes from the command line, thus, a user can specify different options for the commands entered through the command line, therefore, controlling the operating system with greater precision (Shotts Jr, 2012).

Linux operating system is appropriate for individuals who want to learn more about operating systems. Unlike Windows, Linux operating system exposes an individual to details of what takes place. The Command Line Interface (CLI) in Unix or Linux forces an individual to learn because it is the only way of knowing how to use the command line. The operating system also assists a learner to understand with a variety of support available such as man pages.

Many users prefer using Linux due to various reasons that include using Linux to set up internet firewalls as it allows users to set up internet or intranet services. Linux also gets preferred by internet service providers because it does not require a steep licensing fee to install and is compatible with most cheap devices. The software is free and gets distributed according to GNU General Public Licence developed by Richard Stallman (McKinnon & McKinnon, 2004).

Linux Administrators
Linux operating system runs most of the world’s top supercomputers that any other operating system. According to Adelstein & Lubanovic (2007), an astonishing 75 percent of all the top 500 supercomputers in the world run on Linux. This high use of Linux operating systems consequently results in an extraordinarily high demand for Linux administrators. Due to the nature of Linux operating system as a modern and multiuser operating system, it needs a degree of administration more than other less involving and home-market systems.

Responsibilities of a Linux administrator
i. Oversees the physical database design, administration, and documentation

ii. Administer and manage large Linux server environment while focusing more on the performance, monitoring, tuning, and management.

iii. Training and mentoring junior-level administrators as well as giving the direction of technology solutions for the business.

iv. Install, configure, and troubleshoot all the hardware, software, and equipment needed to attain integrated system objectives; offer support services on escalated issues (Carling, Degler, & Dennis, 2000).

v. Provide daily technical support and consulting services for the hardware and operating system environment supporting the collection platform

vi. Creating and maintain user accounts in an organization (Collings, & Wall, 2005).

vii. Give effective first or second-level support for a company’s Linux environment on over 300-plus servers such as Linux blades.

viii. Undertake the management of all factors of the integrity of the environment like the security, monitoring, software management and change control.

ix. Administer infrastructure services – NIS, LDAP, DNS, FTP, SMTP, Postfix/Sendmail, Samba, NFS, – and application as well as database servers particularly focusing on automation and monitoring.

x. To squeeze the best performance from equipment, monitoring the system and utilizing Linux’s built-in configurability wisely.

xi. Interface with other internal support departments like the Database Administrators, Web Services, Storage, Security, Operations, Engineering, Application Development, Change Control and Command Centers.

xii. Provide network troubleshooting services, escalated service desk support as well as monitoring the mission-crucial systems (Adelstein & Lubanovic, 2007)

Linux system administrators have to be highly skilled and competent so as to minimize frequent mistakes and errors by the administrator. Carling, et. al 2000, states that the most common cause of a Linux or Unix system downtime is administrator error. For instance, when an administrator types rm –fr* from the wrong directory. They should also be available since they are always sought to make vital decisions and recommendations. Linux administrators should also continuously improve their proficiency in operating Linux systems through training, seminars, and conferences.

Proposal

The researcher’s job as a Linux administrator in the organization will aim at enhancing the needs assessment process. The job will entail a systematic process of identifying all the loopholes and weaknesses in the Linux system, identifying all the contributing factors and finally creating suitable solutions to address the problems. The improvements and modifications in the Linux system will help the company improve its performance as well as have better cyber security measures. These enhancements in the enterprise will get integrated through the iteration process. Each of the iterations in the enhancement process shall undergo a series of verification testing as well as evaluation of four phases namely, the planning phase, the action phase, the observation phase and the reflection phase.

Iteration 1: Orientation
This iteration will involve brainstorming session with representation from each of the three divisions in the organization. A discussion will occur regarding how to improve the communication flow in the organization. A team will get set to identify the requirements necessary for improving the Linux system in the organization. The objectives of the needs assessment process will get set by the team lead by the Linux administrator. The researcher will gather requirements needed for the enhancement.

Iteration 2: Training

The plan in this iteration is follow up on the brainstorming session with each (one on one) of the three Linux admin experts. This session will discuss the outcome of the brainstorming session and a more detailed discussion of their division’s requirements. The researcher will get trained on the operation of the current system as well as familiarize with the specific roles performed by the system in each of the departments in the organization. The specifications of the hardware and software requirements of the Linux system will get identified in this session.

Iteration 3: Systems Analysis
This step will involve the follow-up meeting with the three Linux professionals to review the identified common requirements, possible integration of requirements, and determine the management of unique requirements at the division level. The researcher is responsible for managing common and integrated requirements, and the appropriate department must handle unique needs. The requirements will get prioritized to determine the most essential in improving the Linux system. At the conclusion of this meeting, the division representatives will be tasked with formulating a solution for all unique requirements.

Iteration 4: Implementation and development

The researcher in this iteration will be required to analyze the feedback of any or all of the unique requirements from each of the divisions. Then, document a final process to collect ‘needs’ from each of the divisions. The documentation will include the new code for the proposed system. The coding of the proposed system will adhere to the specifications identified in previous systems as well as aim to achieve the set objectives.

Iteration 5: Installation and Maintenance
In this session, the installation of the proposed Linux system will involve a piloting model first to determine if the system functions properly. The Linux system will then get installed into various departments of the organizations through the step by step process. Configuring of the system will then get undertake. This session will also involve training of the users of the system. The Linux administrator will then monitor and maintain the new Linux system as it performs the defined functions. The Linux Administrator also manages the Linux files, directories, and processes.